Intuition as an Emergent Phenomenon
Returning to the nine possible approaches to materials design that Paul presented in Thursday’s session, it struck me that although principled frameworks are key to ensuring that materials are effective, this by no means diminishes the value of the other elements in the creative process. I believe it is possible within a framework to have a spontaneous, intuitive, even chaotic and ad hoc approach to materials design informed by experience and inspiration.
Prowse (in Tomlinson 2011: 172) states that ‘course book writing is a creative rather than a mechanical process’ and describes the processes of writers who ‘rely heavily on their own intuitions’ (Prowse, in Tomlinson 2011:158). So what is this thing called intuition, exactly? Some definitions:
- (knowledge from) an ability to understand or know something immediately based on your feelings rather than facts
- The ability to understand something instinctively, without the need for conscious reasoning
The latter definition in particular begs the question ‘what about subconscious reasoning?’ When we walk, we put one fut in front of the other, subconsciously. But at an earlier point in our lives we had to learn to do this. When an accomplished musician plays their instrument, they do so subconsciously. But at an earlier point in their lives they had to learn to do this. When we become fluent in a second language, we articulate our thoughts without conscious attention to the formation of words. But at an earlier point in our lives we had to learn to do this. The list goes on, but the point being that the subconscious consists of learned or developed knowledge and experience. Cambridge Dictionaries Online describe the subconscious as the part of your mind that notices and remembers information when you are not actively trying to do so. So intuition then, in materials design, draws on the subconscious, and the subconscious is based on previously learned knowledge and experience. In a creative process, we draw on what we feel is right. And those feelings emerge from an underlying complex system of experiences, principles, and frameworks. Intuition needn’t be unprincipled. Just because writers aren’t consciously drawing on principles and utilising frameworks, doesn’t mean those principles and frameworks aren’t there.
In my own experiences of materials design and lesson planning, I frequently decide what I want to do/use/create first. So what comes first, the materials or the principles underlying them: the rationale? My decisions are usually based on intuition about what’s going to be beneficial and enjoyable for my learners. Conscious consideration of whether the material is likely to achieve its aims comes after. Or does it?
It’s not as clear cut as that.
I don’t think it can be illustrated accurately in a simple two step process. I think its an ongoing dynamic interplay between principles and intuition, each informing the other so that what emerges is the content I write. So perhaps it would be better illustrated thus:
So those experienced writers who describe their creative process as intuitive rather than principled are perhaps underselling themselves, focusing only on surface thoughts, which are in fact informed by a deeper, subconscious principled framework which has developed, and is developing, through experience and knowledge. And intuition can be viewed as an emergent phenomenon of the interaction between principles, experience and inspiration.
- Prowse, P. (2011) How writers write: testimony from authors. In: Tomlinson, B. (ed). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. p158 – 172.